THE STRONG ARGUMENTS
THE TWO MODES OF OXYGEN
THE ROLE OF NATRIUM - SODIUM
THE ROLE OF KALIUM - POTASSIUM
THE CHEMICAL MODE OF OXIDATION
THE NUCLEAR MODE OF TRANSMUTATION
First uncorrected writing for typos of 12/4/2009
Oxygen is assumed to be the most necessary
element in life. This is because without breathing oxygen we may survive only a
few minutes. However, only oxygen's chemical role which is called oxidation, is
assumed in official biology. This is paradoxical, because oxidation is known as
a strong toxic process against life, for which antioxidants are taken.
Persistent products of oxidation - the free radicals in a body are known to
cause a serious condition-disease the "oxidation stress".
Also, in this respect, oxygen, or oxygen released from ozon or hydrogen
hyperoxide is used as a disinfectant which in reality kills biological life.
These are very strong arguments that the oxidation of oxygen can not be the
reason we breath oxygen. Then what for we breath oxygen ?
There are also quantative arguments that lead to paradoxes related to oxidation.
It seems we breath too little oxygen, if we consider the daily work our bodies
produce and that the oxygen is used in a fast or slow chemical burning, in other
words in oxidation. See also our dedicated for this article.
In a combustion engine, using a fuel and oxygen in a chemical action, that is in
an unquestionable oxidation action, the amount of oxygen used, is million of
times more than the oxygen used by a number of humans, producing all together
the same amount of work. This can be seen from the superior amount of exhausted
gases from the engine's exhaust, compared from the far inferior amount of
released gases from all the humans together. This quantitative difference by
millions, indicates that the action of oxygen used in a combustion engine and
which is carried by a chemical mode, that is undoubtfully by oxidation, is
fundamentally different from the action of oxygen carried by a human.
The fact that the two actions, one carried by an engine- a chemical action, and one carried by a human, differing by a factor of millions, proves that the second action should be a nuclear action which is common to differ by this factor from the chemical action for the same amount of the contributing elements for the corresponding actions, chemical action versus nuclear action.
These proves that oxygen in animals acts by
another mode which should be nuclear in nature, first suggested by the French
Louis Kervran, after he observed the exerted amount of Kalium a human in his
urine, surpasses the intake of this element by mouth, thus this element should
transmute from another element which Kervran proposed Natrium via
oxygen or this element should be created out o0f nothing in the human
body.
Several o0ther facts like
1. The inverse concentration of Natrium versus Kalium inside and outside a cell
makes no sense for any other mode other the mode of nuclear transmutation
of Natrium to Kalium via oxygen.
2. The fact that this transmutation relates to transmembrane potential of a cell.
3. The fact that the difference in the mobility of Natrium versus Kalium, recreates this transmembrane potential.
4. The fact exposing a body to papimi pulses increases both Kalium in blood and the transmembrane potential of the cell.
5. The finding of Pappas that the transmutation of Natrium to Kalium is exothermic - a giving nuclear energy out action, contrary to what Louis Kervran had first assumed, led Pappas to conclude that there is a second good mode of oxygen other than the toxic oxidation mode. The second nuclear mode produced the huge amounts of energy that the chemical mode of oxygen, which is called oxidation could not provide.
6. The fact, nevertheless that the nuclear energy of the transmuted Natrium by Oxygen to Kalium was actually too much predicted by Einstein's formula that is, the "Energy is equal to mass times the square of the velocity of light" - is too much by an actual factor of the order of 1000, led Pappas to reexamine the formula of Einstein and Pappas found.
7. That this formula is actually unproven and wrong, explaining thus that the excess of the predicted energy was due to the invalidity of this formula and not due to the inconsistency of the hypothesis of the nuclear mode of oxygen in humans and animals for the source of their energy.
8. This made Pappas to offer 100000 Euros to anyone proving Pappas wrong with respect to this formula or with respect to his above hypothesis. None has managed to prove Pappas wrong after several years and to make the claim of 100000 Euros from him
Today 12/4/2009
continues....
updated ver. 2.2, Dec 2008
PROFESSOR PAPPAS GENIUS IDEA
FOURIER ANALYSIS OF A SHARP PULSE
Frequencies(1) generator devices may fail
to tune objects, PAPIMI
may never fail.
As a matter of scientific fact, Papimi does not produce frequencies, Papimi produces steep magnetic pulses. To explain that these pulses may beuniversal tuners, we shall explain what a steep pulse may do. We shall compare it with the steep stroke of a piano hammer on a particular piano string. When a piano string is hit by ahammer stroke or with a sharp pulse produced by the hammer, the piano string vibrates at its own resonant frequency what ever this frequency is, which does not depend on the hammer steep stroke-pulse, but it depends only on the strings resonant frequency. The steep hammer stroke without a particular resonant frequency causes the string to vibrate at its resonant frequency, which was preset by the musician who had tuned the piano chords previously.
The same thing happens with a pen stroke-pulse on a guitar string.
The pen does not produce any frequency, the strings do, which were carefully
tuned previously by the guitarist. Another example is a bell with a hammer
hanging from its top. Another example is the hitting of the tuning fork, which
the musicians use as a precision tool to produce a fundamental frequency which
does not on fork hit at all.
This basic and
fundamental phenomenon strangely enough, is not mentioned by Physics. Physics
always likes to talk about resonance between tuned systems with identical tuning
frequency. It never talks about the fundamental effect of a stroke-pulse to set up
any
resonant vibration.
As a matter of fact stroke-pulse frequencies is the origin of every frequency in nature, which in case of resonance may be transmitted from one system to another. The original frequency of a vibration is always a stroke-pulse.
This phenomenon can be even demonstrated in every instance. For example, get a little tea spoon and strike with it, in the same way, various objects, a glass, another bigger glass, a pot, a plate, a table, a door, a window glass, etc. You will always hear the different characteristic frequency of the object with the spoon hitting it in the same way.
This was the genius idea of Professor Pappas to create PAPIMI, which hits with a magnetic sharp pulse various biological objects to energize them at their specific vibration frequency, without knowing this frequency, or even, if this frequency of the biological object, continuously changes during a day, a month, a year! This is the reason devices with prefixed frequencies may fail.
This phenomenon may not be mentioned in Physics, however, it is mentioned and analyzed in Mathematics. In Mathematics, it is called the "Fourier" Transformation or analysis of a function or just of a change. Do you have to be a Professor of Physics and the sane time a Professor ot Mathematics to know it ? In our opinion No. Just a logical and observing common things mind is enough.
Panos Pappas
Professor of Physics
Professor of Mathematics
Note: Initially, we had reported PAPIMI may cause
Fourier frequencies from 1 Hz to over 250MHz.
250 MHz was the limit which our initial digital oscilloscope could record.
(First digital Oscilloscopes appeared in early1990s). Having the feeling that
higher frequencies may exist, we used the phrase "over 250MHz". Our newest FFT
digital oscilloscope records frequencies in Giga Hertz - GHz. Expecting the same
story could be repeated with a future better digital oscilloscope, we use the
expression "in the GHz range"
References
(1) http://www.trufax.org/general/frequencies.html