MOYSIDIS ATTEMPTS TO RECTIFY HIS ASSUMED FAULT AGAINST EIENTEIN'S RELATIVITY

REFERENCES:

1. "The original Ampere Force and Biot-Savart and Lorentz Forces", 1982,
by P.T. Pappas, Department of Physics, Division of Mechanics, University of Athens, Panepisatiopolis, 621.
2. "Rigorous quantitative test of Biot-Savart-Lorentz Fores", 1984,
by P.T. Pappas, Department of Physics, National University of Athens, Panepstimiopolis, Athens, 15771 Greece,
and P.G. Moysidis, Physics Laboratory A, National Technical University of Athens, Polytechniopolis, Athens, 15773 Greece.
3. "Experimental verification of the Biot-Savart-Lorentz and Ampere force laws in a closed circuit, revisited", 1989,
by P.G. Moysidis, Physics Laboratory A, National Technical University of Athens, Polytechniopolis, Athens, 15773 Greece.
4. Forces on a Stigma Antenna—Physics Essays 3, 211 (1990), by P.T. PAPPAS AND TIM VAUGN

MOYSIDIS TRIES TO REVISE, IN 1989, A PREVIOUS PAPER OF MINE AND HIM OF 1984, IN WHICH WE REPORT A REPETITION OF A  PREVIOUS EXPERIMENT OF MINE OF 1982. THE REPEATED EXPERIMENT  WAS  CARRIED  IN ATHENS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY ALSO AFTER MY INITIAL EXPERIMENT 1. IN 1982. WE ALSO WROTE UP A FINAL REPORT 2.,THERE, THAT TIME.
SOON, MOYSIDIS CRYING WITH TEARS, REQUESTED ME TO LEAVE FROM THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FOR, HE SAID, THERE WAS NO FUTURE FOR HIM, IF HE EVOLVED MYSELF, AS LONG I WAS THERE, TRYING TO DISPROVE EINSTEIN. MOYSIDIS HAD NO FARTHER FUTURE, HE SAID, IN THE TEACHING HIERARCHY OF THE ATHENS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY- ONE OF THE BEST UNIVERSITIES OF GREECE.

AFTER ME LEAVING ACCORDING TO HIS REQUEST, FOR HE WAS THE ONE TO INVITE ME THERE, FOR I HAD HELPED HIM IN THE PAST IN WRITING HIS PHD DISSERTATION AND HOPING LIKE THIS TO INCREASE HIS QUALIFICATIONS. OBVIOUSLY I HAD BECAME A "PERSONA NON GRATA" BY THE REST STAFF FOR I WAS NOT SUPPORTING EINSTEIN!

MOYSIDIS WROTE AND PUBLISHED THE PAPER 3., IN AN ATTEMPT,  TO PLEASE, FARTHER, THE STAFF WHICH WOULD ELECT LATER AND PROMOTE UP MOYSIDIS

THE SCIENTIFIC CENSORSHIP IN FAVOR AND PROMOTION OF EINSTEIN IS OBVIOUS.

MOYSIDIS REFERS TO THE PRESUMABLY RESULTS OF A COMPUTER PROGRAM WHICH IS CALLED "MINUIT" AND WHICH IN USE PRIVATELY AND WHICH IS NOT PUBLICLY KNOWN. HE ASKS US TO BELIEVE THEM WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO INSPECT THEM MATHEMATICALLY. NEVER THE LESSS, MOYSIDIS REMAINS COMPLETELY SILENT FOR KEY ARGUMENTS PRESENTED IN MY PAPER 1. IN WHICH THE REACTION OF THE PI FRAME GOES INTO THE ELECTRMAGNETIC FIELD. IN ORDER THE FIELD TO RECEIVE A REACTION P EXPRESSED BY MOMENTUM, IT SHOULD RECEIVE A CORRESPONDING ENERGY E=PC. THIS ENERGY IS OF ENORMOUS AMOUNT, EXCEEDING MANY ORDERS THE ENERGY AVAILABLE BY THE BATTERIES, MOTIVATING EXPERIMENT 1. LIKE THAT SUPPORTING A LAW OBEYING ACTION AND REACTION, LIKE THE AMPERE FORCE LAW AGAINST EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY. THERE FOR MOYYSIDIS PAPER HAS NO MATHEMATICAL VALUE NOR PHYSICAL VALUE, DISPLAYING NO OWN SKILL OF MOYSIDIS.!

MOYSIDIS KEEPS SILENT FOR THE STIGMA ANTENNA EXPERIMENT 4., IN WHICH THE ANTENNA SHOULD SELF ROTATE ACCORDING TO RELATIVITY AND ITS LORENTZ FORCE LAW. NEVER THE LESS, THE ANTENNA, PROVED HAVING ENOUGH SENSITIVITY FOR ROTATING, IN FACT DOES NOT ROTATE.! DISPROVING LIKE THAT RELATIVITY AND ITS REACTIONLESS LORENTZ FORCE LAW, IN FAVOR TO THE NON RELATIVISTIC AMPERE FORCE LAW. MOYSIDIS FOR THIS MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL ARGUMENT KEEPS SILENT.

MOYSIDIS ACTED IN THIS WAY TO PLEASE HIS COLLEAGUES WHO WERE GOING TO PROMOTE HIM, BY  SUPPORTING RELATIVITY AND EINSTEIN AND PRESERVING LIKE THIS THE CORRUPTION OF THE 21ST CENTURY SCIENCE.