To be corrected

The Collapse of the Big Bang - Long live the “Theory of Continuous Creation”

Panagiotis Pappas

The theory of Big Bang, is the theory of the "one time creation" of matter, before 13.5 billions years, from an explosion point in the Universe, that is not determined by the authors of this theory. 
On the contrary, the theory of continuous creation of  matter, is the theory  of "everywhere and always" creation of matter, in very small percentage, in order that this creation, does not become experimental perceptible in the laboratory and in small relative time intervals in the order of human life 100-200 years, but of course becomes perceptible in big scales, planetary - stellar and big time periods of the order of millions of years. The existence of mines and deposits, millions of years, with different constitution of substance in the surface and the subsoil revolving, in 24 hours, body, as the Earth,  denies categorically the Big Bang theory for the origin of chemical elements from an unknown point in the Universe, before 13,5 billions years.

If this theory was right, there will be expected the chemical elements that emanated from the big explosion and reached in the space of Earth, which is indeed revolving 24 hours, to be homogenised and apportioned  with a rotational symmetry, in the her surface  and her direct subsoil, a fact that we know  with absolute certainty for the Earth, more from any other knowledge for the Universe, happens, precisely because the existence of mines and deposits with different constitution from the rest of the Earth. In the Earth exist mines and deposits, eg, the enormous deposits of bauxite in the interior of mountain Parnassos, in Greece. This mountain today is full from tunnels and galleries of excavation in all mountain, which someone needs days with car to explore them', as these has personally explored by the writer. This existence strengthens of course the theory of continuous creation of matter from nearly similar matter, everywhere and always, in the space and time, as well as the theory of increasing or expanded Earth, the “orogennisis”, ( this term literaly means “mount formation” ) and as an extension,  of the expanded Universe, the creation of stars and the creation of their final phase of - explosion of stars, it explains the teams of concentration of various stellar groups in local concentrations: planetary systems, galaxies , groups of galaxies, as we should say it simultaneously explains the law of  EDDIGTON L/L _H = (M/M _H)^{a .} This formula can be written: L= constant x M^a , where a = 2 - 4.5 (L increases approximately as M³ for stars on the order of 10 solar masses, as M^4.5 for stars of around 1 solar mass, and as M² for low-mass stars).

Provided that, a varies, it is variable, this formula is approximative. Base of present theory, matter is created with the presence near other matter. So the M depends from the distance of existence of other matter. So M is altered by the density of the Star which in the above formula is not taken into consideration. Obviously it is in effect, a similar formula, M=constant x M^a , that is also this approximate formula and that is not taken into consideration. What is remarkable is that the luminosity of a star is in interrelation of  his  mass and not of his constitution, as it should be, if the luminosity was coming from thermonuclear  reactions,

for stars and for the extended law of creation of PAUL LAVIOLETTE for the stars and simultaneously for the planets.

Above diagram from the book:  "Subquantum Kinetics" with permission of the author PAUL LAVIOLETTE  http://www.etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-SQK.html

http://www.etheric.com/LaViolette/Predict2.html

W hat EINSTEIN could not think of

The genius diagram of Paul LaViolette deserves two Nobel prices. Because, it reveals that the internal heat of Earth and Planets is similar with that of certain Stars. Because we know that in the interior of the Earth do not take place thermonuclear reactions, as show the various volcanoes, we conclude that in these Stars do not also happen eminently thermonuclear reactions, part of his heat, should be free energy. Hence, big masses produce in their interior free energy.  

For experimental verification of PAUL LAVIOLETTE theories click here www.rexresearch.com/brush/brush.htm

We can choose the following three characteristic and tangible examples from the very examples that could exist and the theory of Big Bang cannot obviously explain, but explain of course the theory of continuous creation,

1^st) the veins of gold, an element chemically inactive, that is concentrated (it takes shape -  it is created )  in linear seams in the subsoil. 

2^nd) The radioactive radon with highest time of half-life hardly 4 days (2.4 h, 14.6 h, 23.9 m, 25 ms, 054 ms, 35 ms, 3.96 s, 25 m, 25.7 m, 5 ms, 6 ms, etc, max 3.8 days) that is emitted as it is known, continuously everywhere and always from the subsoil and that naturally and obviously cannot exist from the Big Bang, because obviously his short life. Even if we suppose that each atom of radon emanates from some other atom, e.g. the radium, via radioactive split, then the question is transferred again in the existence of this last element in the subsoil of Earth. Because, some moment afterwards the Big Bang, in the same time with radon, as that the rhythm of split of element supposingly, of production of radon, it should be with the rhythm of split of the continuously emmited radon, that has relatively very small time of half-life - 4 days, it would have also this element of production been exhausted, similarly accordingly with radon.
 

Mathematic Observation, a radioactive element with time of half-life of 4 days (or similar value T) and initial mass the mass of the entire Earth (the biggest mass that it can has a certain element in the Earth) according to the law of radioactive decay of half-divided, it is calculated that in one year, it will have remained hardly about a thousand gram, that is to say, practical zero. In time interval, for example, a few thousands of years, the calculation gives remaining mass, much smaller than the individual mass of this element, in any kind of element, that is to say the absolute zero with the strict sense of word. This constitutes a complete proof against Big Bang theory and in favour of the theory of continuous creation.

If we now suppose similarly that all the mass of the visible Universe after the Big Bang constitute, from a radioactive element with time of half-life of 4 days, today after 13.5 billions years, this also would have been absolutely disappeared with remaining mass smaller, for example, the radon, even that of hydrogen. The supporters of Big Bang, that obviously did not make yet these Mathematics, will disappear too. We will mention the relative calculations in Appendix in a few days.

Appendix: the law of radioactive decay of division/halfed?? is m=m ₀  exp (-λt), where λ=ln2/T and T = time of half-life. Considering initial mass m of ₀  radon equal with the mass of Earth 5.97x10 ²⁴ Kgr, m ₀  = 5.97x10 ²⁴ Kgr, we have with λ=ln2/4days
m = 5.97x10 ²⁴ Kgr x exp (-365ln2/4) = 3.396 x 10 ^-28  x 5.97x10 ²⁴  = 2.0196 mg, remaining mass of roughly 2 mg radon after one year, 365 days, when the initial mass of radon was all the mass of Earth! (Factor of reduction of Radon by year 3.396 x 10 ^-28  < 10000 x 10 ^-28  = 10 ^-24 . Factor of reduction in hundred years (3.396) ¹⁰⁰  x 10 ^-2800
 

that tends obviously to zero.  We remind at this point that complete forces of number smaller than one, tend to zero).
Considering now initial mass m ₀  = 0. 1767 x 10 ⁶⁴ < 10 ⁶⁴  Kgr of radon equal and bigger than the mass of all visible Universe, that is to say all (and bigger) the mass of objects in the Universe, that we can see with the bigger telescopes on Earth, that is to say the bigger mass that can have radon in the Universe. With λ and T as above and t = 13.5 billions years in days, i.e. t = 13.500.000.000 x 365, we have
m = m ₀  exp (-λt) = m ₀  exp(-ln2/4 x365x 13500000000x365) = m ₀  x (3.396 x 10 ^-28 ) ^{365x13.500000000}  = 0! higher (and still higher) value of m ₀ = 10 ⁶⁴  Kgr), 
m = 10 ⁶⁴  Kgr x (3.396 x 10 ^-28 ) ^13.500000000  < 10 ⁶⁴  Kgr x (10000 x 10 ^-28 ) ^13.500000000 

1064 Kgr  x (10^-24  )^13.500000000 = 10⁶⁴ Kgr  x 10^{-24 x13.500000000} = 10^{-24 x 13.500000000 +64} Kgr = 0 Kgr

practically absolutely zero Kgr,  in contrast with any mass of elementary particle or any mass of atomic??? element !  This should not make us any surprise. We remind once again that complete forces of number smaller than one,  tend to zero. Proportionally, they are in effect also for the remain radioactive elements with time of half-life T, with any known value of T! Not known radioactive element with the usual years of half-life, could have survived from the time of Big Bang up to now!
Naturally we say, it cannot have also remained radium after the Big Bang, for those that believe today, that the source of radon is radium.
 

Thus for radon the conclusion is, this cannot have no origin straight from the Big Bang, nor origin from any other radioactive element that emanates also from the Big Bang, and thus it remains to suppose that the Radon is created in the subsoil or that his maternal element is created also long time after Big Bang and in particular in the subsoil of Earth, always proving thus the theory of continuous creation.
 

Other Remarks - Predictions of theory of continuous creation

The Pebbles of a beach.  click here to see pictures and read comments 

It is known, the pebbles of a beach are roughly the same in size and in form. Various beaches are constituted from different at beach pebbles but similar among them themselves, from big pebbles up to thin grains of sand. This phenomenon does not have any classic explanation. It is simply explained however by the law of continuous creation. Similar material pebble generate nearly similar pebble. Thus all the pebbles of a beach have been generated from one - two - etc pebbles.

GIVEN THE FACT THAT THAT ONLY THE 25% OF EXPECTED NEUTRINOS FROM THE SUN REACH THE EARTH WITHOUT MEANWHILE ANY LOSS, IT MEANS THAT ONLY THE 25% OF THE ENERGY OF THE SUN IS THERMONUCLEAR. THE 75%  IS CREATED  BY SOMETHING ELSE.

A detail that was last found, the above mentioned netrino  is the said n _e  that is split in n _μ  coming from the Sun. Consequently the sum of the two, should be the expected netrinos from the Sun in order to emanates all his energy from thermonuclear fusion. However nothing such has been shown up until today. Hence the problem for the total energy of the Sun that supposedly is still owed in thermonuclear fusion remains. Hence the solar energy is partly owed in thermonuclear fusion because the existence of these netrinos and in part in  free  energy because of the lack these same netrinos.  

The Law of HUBBLE for the Expanded UNIVERSE 

U = Hr (H=1.8 10^-18 Sec^-1)

Predominance of matter in the UNIVERSE and NOT of the ANTIMATTER

Turning GALAXIES with  spiral  helixes

OROGENESIS
PLANETARY BIRTH AND GROWTH
STELLAR BIRTH GROWTH AND EXPLOSION
CREATION of PLANETS AND DEVELOPMENT INTO STARS
INTERNAL HEAT OF PLANETS
RADIATION AND ENERGY OF STARS

SEISMIC ACTIVITY

PRODUCED ELEMENTS IN PLANET EARTH - WATER, OXYGEN…

LAWS of CONSERVATION and NOT   click here Αppendix 2

All the astronomic values are taken by  ^{"Astrophysical Quantities" by C.W. Allen, Third Edition, Universitry of  London, THE ATHLONE PRESS, 1973}

Medium density in Universe P  = 3x10 ⁹  M il / Mpc ³, M il ??? = 1.989x10 ³⁰ Kgr, Mpc = 3.0857 x10 ²¹  m,  receiving P Universe =  speed of Light  x  Age of Universe  = 299792 Km/sec x 13.5x10 ⁹  x365x24x3600 sec = 1.276 x 10 ²⁹  m,  Universe Mass   m = P x B =  P of x 4/3 of p R ^{3 =}  3x10 ⁹  M il / Mpc of ³  x 4/3 of p  x (1.276 x 10 ²⁹  m) ³ =  3x10 ⁹  x  1.989x10 ³⁰ Kgr / (3.0857 x10 ²¹  m ) ³  x 4/3 x 3.14 x (1.276 x 10 ²⁹  m) ³  = 1.767 x 10 ^{(9+30- 3x21 + 3x29)}  Kgr = 1.767 x 10 ⁶³  = 0.1767 x 10 ⁶⁴

The isotopes of Radιum that give radon with their half-life times are :
²²³Ra  t1/2:  ≈ 11.43  days,      ²²⁴Ra  t1/2:   ≈ 3.63 days,     ²²⁶Ra  t1/2:  ≈ 1599  days.

The two first isotopes have half-life time comparable with radon, that is the reason they are expected to disappear fast as the radon. Accordingly it only interests us the third Radium isotope.
The Law of radioactive decay is written under differential form and as following:

dN / dt  = - λN ,  for radon dN ₁ / dt  = - λ₁ N ₁  and for radium dN ₂ / dt  = - λ₂ N ₂ .  The production of radon in the Earth is constant. Be it therefore that this happens because the radon as long as is split, this is replaced from radium. That is to say dN ₁ / dt = dN ₂ / dt, then and l ₁ N ₁  = λ₂ N ₂ .
Because N ₁ are finally constant replaced, λ ₁, λ ₂  constants, then and the N ₂ constant, that is false, because it would be supposed it declines, except and even if this is replaced similarly with radon from a third element, Then we will have for the third element:
dN ₁ / dt = dN ₂ / dt = dN ₃ / dt, due to λ ₁ N ₁  = λ ₂ N ₂  = λ ₃ N ₃

Finally, we can exalt in ν times and last element the stability of last element,  but however the last element cannot be constant in quantity,  but decreased without replacement, this we can say is reversing all the previous stabilities where arbitrarily we supposed.

Moreover relation λ₁Ν₁ = λ₂Ν₂ = λ₃Ν₃ = .....= λ_vΝ_v.  that will be supposed it is in effect for the replacement elements in the subsoil of the Earth, reversely proportionally with constants λ, is conspiratorial and completely improbable and impossible to be in effect, because the split elements (except gases) will be supposed to find itself in the place of maternal elements. This of course does not happen in the case of deposits, which are not mixes of elements nuclear related.

The only explanation that remains once again is the theory of continuous creation.

3^rd) the deposits of the clean and very active chemically  sulphur that sate in the Earth, coming supposingly from the Big Bang. Obviously, the sulphur is impossible, coming in a long time period of (billions of years), progressively to act chemically and to shape the various and steady sulphur salts.

We can say that the deposits of oil and waters will never be exhausted, provided that they are drawn with smaller rhythm than the rhythm of reproduction-creation. Thus are explained the so much wrong predictions for the exhaustion of oils before the decade 1980, while in the year 2008, no one dares to refer to any new exhaustion.

The current Trivia for the exhaustion of water click here  will constitute the repetition of "fiasco of exhaustion of oils" click here  here  and here. The biggest losses of waters from the planet Earth are slipping in space, as water vapours, with the slipping of other gases. The exhaustion of water will exist, if this slipping is increased or the reproduction of water is decreased or happens a combination of the two. 
Proportionally they will happen with other gases of atmosphere, eg the oxygen, which appears to be gathered continuously in big quantities by the subsoil. This gathering becomes obvious, from the gathering of oxygen from the bottom of oceans, with the gathering and other gases, under a form of wide scale of bubbles. (The production of oxygen from the plants and decreased continuously forests, do not explain the stability of this element).

One of these assumptions, appears to explain why planet Mars shows, from the large numbers of corrosions that has (his watercourses of rivers are still showed ), to have very large number of waters sometimes. While today, after billions years, it appears to have a little and is considered as "dead planet". In Mars there has not been remained water today in order to produce water from similar substance! As we stressed for the law of the Continuous Creation:  Matter repeats nearly Similar matter "God's principle of Creation" and energy (heat) repeats energy (heat) .

The above are explained by the theory of "Continuous Creation".

Finally, we shall not forget to stress the felicitous event, that the theory of "Continuous Creation" explains why the oxygen of atmosphere O₂  is not decreased perceptibly by his various combustions, while the increment of the main product of this combustion, the carbon dioxide CO ₂ , on the contrary has been increased perceptibly (without it is decreased the O₂, despite the bond of O₂  in CO₂  at quantitative equivalence a molecule of O₂  to a molecule of CO₂. Since we know from the chemistry that equal numbers of molecules of two gases occupy equal volumes and provided that, as the O₂  so much the CO ₂  are those two gases (at the chemistry, equal volumes of gases under KSPC ??? contain the same  number of molecules), the increment of one would be supposed undeniably to involve the reduction of the other, which however is not observed. Provided that, in this respect, CO ₂ increases and it is split in O₂  and C from the insufficiency of plant kingdom (because his restriction in the last years), the only explanation that can be given for this fact, is that O₂  is created in the planet Earth in a way to fulfil  his engagement and accordingly his consumption.

It does not have so much importance that the Big Bang theory is completely wrong theory with our current datas, as long as the fact that this theory of the once and only creation of Matter and energy displaces a genuine theory with enormous Geopolitical importance – The theory of the Continuous Creation of Energy and matter. Maybe the word Geopolitical in this case, expresses very insufficiently this importance. The word Universal importance expresses maybe more completely this importance.
Indeed, the energy, at the beginning, is one determinative factor for the interplanetary travels, (extraterrestrial and not) which require enormous, energies of acceleration, enormous energies of deceleration, energies of keeping the above energies for big time intervals, without possibility of supplies, and in this we are not taking into account the big need of material needs and foods which the transportation requires more needs of energy. 

  The Solution of energy storage and transport with a spatial ship in a spatial travel, is increasing unimaginably the needs of expenses in energy, thus for relatively longer travels so this solution is not practically a solution. It is as if we want to make the round of the Earth with a car, under the term, that we might not be able to refuel nowhere. The ostensible solution that we can firstly think is to transport the needed fuels with an additional big trailing truck, we should think two times this solution, because, this transport would be completely impossible for the needs of a relatively long distance after a limit, or the addition in consumption of the energy for the travelled fuels would be bigger to weight of advantage of the additional refuelling in these fuels and the addition energy that they would offer.

Indeed, this is the big problem of interplanetary travels today from  humanity and not the lack of some other unknown superior technology that we do not allocate.  If the supremacy of aviation is undeniable from military viewpoint, an autonomous and independent from fuels plane is certainly a super weapon even in the hands of a pilot. A technique of reproduction of free energy in a plane would resolve the issue of energy sufficiency so much that it could renders him an autonomous traveller of Space.

Unfortunately, the short-sighted human oversight sees only the military advantages of the reproduced free energy in a point that this technology is considered obviously as the most confidential technology with all the consequences of the most taken care of dissimulation and the need of camouflage her from one similar other wrong theory, as is the theory of the one and unique big explosion in the final past, before 13,5 billions years, without it is determined, unthinkable, nowhere the place today (and how can be on the other hand) this non-existent unique explosion, that is said Big Bang.

The theory of Continuous Creation, as it is stated here, was developed by the Professor Dr Panagiotis Pappas, at least from 1990. It should be stressed that the present theory differs radically from the theory of Continuous Creation of the English Astrophysicist Fred Hoyle, who supposes that matter is created in the empty space with an accidental probability, which, from the exposed here, it appears to be very wrong.

On the contrary, the theory of Continuous Creation of the Greek Professor Panagiotis Pappas realises that  matter creates matter WITH the LAW of RESEMBLANCE -  the MATTER IS PRODUCED BY NEARLY SIMILAR MATTER "GOD'S PRINCIPLE OF CREATION" AND ENERGY (HEAT) IS PRODUCED BY SIMILAR ENERGY (HEAT),  there that PREVIOUSLY existed matter and there was not the void, of course not in the empty space (the void repeats void). The production of matter becomes in the interior of the big mountains???, in the interior of planets, in the interior of stars, in the centre of galaxies, etc, and in particular the rythm of reproduction is relatively proportional with the existing mass. This means that the reproduction of substance becomes at a scale of exponence (the resulting differential equation has at a scale of exponence solution) and that for a pretty large planet?? it receives explosive dimensions (because the interrelation at a scale of exponence is moved to her vertical part). This is precisely observed in the explosions of big asters, known as explosions Super-Nova.

Precisely the same happens also with the reproduction of energy for which we can give an analogous description. The present theory, is founded by the most important discoveries of the  leading Greek - American Astrophysicist Dr Paul LaViolette and keeps pace with his relevant opinions.

For experimental verification of PAUL LAVIOLETTE theories click here www.rexresearch.com/brush/brush.htm

From the huge number of examples where we can still  say is also the following colourful example. In Holland Stones do not exist in mountains and in fields, thus the Stones do not “repeat” Stones in Holland. The farmers do not know the Stones in Holland. On the contrary in Greece, the Greek farmers for many thousands years now, each year when the farmers grown they remove the Stones from their fields and not having what to do with them, they build stone walls – “kserolithies” ??? as they called them, where they separate characteristically their fields. And this happens every year, when they grow their fields, and the farmers again remove Stones and the Stones do not appear to finish… and thus kserolithies still grow and grow. 

PP