UPDATE OF 15/8/2014
pappas1.jpg
RECOVERED FROM STROKE
(with some newer smaller updates
and typo corrections)
NÏ OÍÅ YET HAS CRITICIZED OR OPPOSED
US, WE RECEIVE ONLY SUPPRTING COMMENTS AND
CONGRADULATIONS.
THIS SECTION IS WRITTEN WITH
HIGH DIFFICULTY, WHILE THE AUTHOR STAYS AT HOME, PARAPLEGIC WITH ONE HAND,
WITH ONE FINGER LEFT, WITHOUT SENSATION, (TOUCH AND
PRESSURE FEELINGS, DIFFICULT TO WRITE CORRECTLY, EVEN TO SIGN HIS SIGNATURE) BY A THIRD BRAIN STROKE FOR ABOUT 5
YEARS AGO. See, also, section
(34b). EVEN TO
OPEN MY LAP TOP
OR PRESS SIMULTAIOUSLY TWO KEYS, I HAVE TO ASK ASSISTANCE OF
AN
ATTENDANT!
EVERYTHING THAT IS WRITTEN IN
THIS SECTION, IS VALID AND TRUE, EXCEPT
UNNOTICED SMALL TYPO MISTAKES.
FREE ENERGY - THE GREATEST AND
SIMPLEST PROOF OF MY LIFE
The result of the above TV tube (or
Cathode Ray tube) is the final speed of an electron is
bigger than its initial speed: U final > UX initial
which can enter into
another tube like this one; at point A,
following the original direction of UX
and similarly. into
another such tube and so on... Finally redirected in
to the first one at point A with the same direction as the
original of UX, U reaching as much
exponentially high values of free energy, towards infinity
and self destruction, as with
every other perpetual mobile happens, and without any
relevant consumption of energy......
This example proves the principle of creation with
tremendous economic and social implications, when a limiter
is applied to avoid infinity and self-destruction. .
IMPROVED VERSION
click1 here for
correcting the right end effect and click2 here for
answering several invited suggestions
FIRST
POSTED AND PUBLISHED WORLD WIDE BY THE AUTHOR ON 20/3/2010
P.T.P
NON
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY-PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUOUS CREATION OF
ENERGY- IN CONFORMITY OF THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF
CONTINUOUS CREATION-see below (selection column)
USUALLY
INCREASING - CREATING
ENERGY
ENERGY
PRODUCING SIMILAR ENERGY See
relevant topics in the selection column
Standard
TV Cathode or Oscilloscope tube with only one vertical
diversion electrodes, electrostatically charged, assuming
well insulated, without any leakage, provision is made for Ux is big
enough or most important, the distance between the
electrodes of vertical diversion, so that no electrons reach
the upper positive plate.
Assuming,
though we doubt very much that the passing electron through
the whole of the anode, has paid its energy ticket, the
velocity Ux at
is determined as the accelerated velocity according to the
potential difference between cathode and anode, without
consuming any energy from the potential difference. We
clearly claim that the vertical gai/ned there velocity UY
is also totally unjustified.
Below we prove this last statement.
The total kinetic energy of
the passing electron through is therefore E = 1/2 mU2
= 1/2mUX2 +1/2m UY2
. .with U2=UX2
+ UY2 . and
U .> UX
Which
is the initial velocity after the electron passed the
anode at point A and nothing is consumed there by this
passing there.
The energy 1/2m UY2 is a created new energy- as free
energy of the system This
amount of energy can be repeated for as many electrons we
can wait for,
click here, for seeing the diagram of
repeating gaining free energy electron
and without any corresponding energy consumption.
The principle of conservation of energy is not generally
valid. Energy is not always conserved. See also PAPIMI as at least 120% over unity
device, here. below (selection
column). The above configuration is a miniature
accelerator compared to CERN
accelerator. However, what we are concerned is the
relevant understanding of the people there about non
conservation of energy or energy continuous creation or
energy's possibility of increase to selfdistruction
that these people did not expect.
The
Principle of leas/t action for the above system for the
Theoretical Phycist, CERN
Scientist and any other
relevant Professional.
The
principle of least action is considered as the most advanced
method in Theoretical
.Physics in this case. However, for conservation of energy,
the symmetry with respect to time is required However,
as we have already shown in an elementary way, there is no
symmetry in time for the energy increases with time So one
of the basic requirements of this Principle is not fulfilled
in this case. Tautologically, therefore, the Principle of
least action is trivial here and can
not offer more than we have shown for the non conservation of energy of the
above system.
If we are wrong, 100000 Euros reward for the
first claimer, as it is offered in other places in this
site. None has self made a
claim today 14/8/2014 morning yet!
We receive only supporting
messages.
NEWER
CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS
AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE
SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE
CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW
PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND
INCORRECT
In
case you have made a claim or
to confirm your claim or because it was lost, please call
personally Pro.PT Pappas at code +30210. office number 9270807,
Home number 9012028, Fax +302109011620 or mobile or cell
phone, code + 30, number 6944338415, e-mail
ppappas@papimi.com, local time +2 hours GMT
(Greenwich Mean Time) or +3 hours GMT taking into
account the silly summer time, in case, it is
applicable..+ international code
as defined by the calling country, 30 code for Greece, 210
code for the city of Athens. Ordinary postal address is not given for security
reasons. VALID CONTACTS ARE
THOSE GIVEN HERE BY PHONE ,FAX,
AND E-MAIL.
SOME PEOPLE, NOT DARING TO CONTACT
US PROPERLY. THEY ARE BLUFFING TO CREATE WRONG
IMPRESSIONS BY HIDING FROM US THEIR ALLEGED
OBJECTIONS.
LANGUAGE OF CONTACT SHOULD BE
GREEK OR ENGLISH
with the power of logic
Prof.
Dr. P.T. PAPPAS
NOTE1:
Claimers should contact us. See contacts in the front page.
None has made a claim,
today
NOTE
2: Claimers should make their claims on the current accepted
physical laws taught at generally recognized Universities
except the principle of conservation Energy which is shown
here generally not correct..
NOTE
3 Do not hesitate to claim,
nothing to lose, nothing to pay! All correspondence
will be posted here. None has self made a claim oyet, morning
14/8/2014, neither by e-mail or
directly by phone or Fax. We receive only supporting
messages.
NEWER
CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS
AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE
1SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE
CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW
PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND
INCORRECT
A
Second independent proof will be added here soon.......FOR
THE PROOF SEE BELOW.
Dedicated to the late Stefan Marinov and Leon Dragone who were dedicated in all
their short lifes to
perpetual mobile. I wish they were with us to know
the above indisputable example.
with the power of logic
PTP
Notice
0, The left or entering
electron end effect is always accelerating, favoring our
conclusions and results for the creation or excess energy.
MATHEMATICAL
PROOF BASED ON VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES
The electric field of two
opposite charges Ntice the corespondin end effects is relative
very curved.
The electrical field of two
elongated distributed opposite charges by a distance x,
Notice the corresponding end effect is lessened with respect
to the above end effects The radius of curvature of the end
effects is shorterer the
shorter is the radius of curvature compared the capacitor
below. This a very
important element here.
Similarly,
the electric field of two elongated distributed charges,
capacitor distributions. The length of distribution here is
x +Äx. Notice the slight variation and
inwards smoothening of the end effects lessened by a
second and higher order but definite amount of
magnitude. The longer is the capacitor by Äx the bigger is the radius of
curvature at the end effects. Thi
is a very key element here to prove, beyond any doubt, the non conservation of energy or better
the creation of energy
and from this creation of universe. See text.
Thus,
checking the electrical lines in
reality in a charged capacitor, the end effect of
the capacitor is lessened the longer the capacitor is!
The
end effect of the lines is obvious at the two ends of the
capacitor. The higher position is the exit of the electron,
the higher is the horizontal draw back on the electron.
However, if we assume the capacitor becomes a little longer
by an amount Äx The end effect of this lethening will be only secondary
(second order or higher and of the opposite sign) to
Äx .However the vertical gained
velocity upwards of the electron will be inverse
proportional to the first order of Äx . This is
a contradiction and excludes the fact the end
effect of the electric field will compensates the extra
energy gained by the electron. This proves that THE END
EFFECT WILL NOT MAKE THE
ENERGY TO BE CONSERVED AS IT ASSUMED IN CLASSICAL PHYSICS.
Q.E.D
PTP